STATES SUFFER BLOW ON COSTS OF ALIENS MEASURE
September 22, 1984
Section: MAIN NEWS
Page: A09
By John Johnson
--WASHINGTON - In a jarring defeat for states and western
agriculture, House-Senate immigration conferees on Friday adopted a
new guest-worker program and a federal grant system that critics
fear will not cover the cost of legalizing millions of aliens. A
disgruntled Hispanic lobbyist who has fought the Simpson-Mazzoli
immigration bill for two years said he thinks the bill now has a 60
percent chance of becoming law. 'The string is thickening,' said a
happy Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Long Beach, referring to the oft-used
remark that the bill has been hanging by 'a thread' for months.
Any celebrating could be premature, however, because conferees have
not been able to resolve a dispute on an anti-discrimination
package. Sen. Alan Simpson, R-Wyo., the bill's chief sponsor, said
he would work over the weekend to settle the controversy over an
amendment setting up special machinery to monitor claims of job bias
under the new law.
Though Simpson sounded upbeat about getting an agreement,
Democrats close to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the amendment's
author, said he was 'not optimistic.'
Simpson has already been in touch with the Reagan administration to
review the bill's cost. Reagan had warned that a bill adorned with
too many costly programs could bring a veto. The White House had no
comment late Friday, but since the $4 billion grant program approved
by the conferees Friday was much like the one offered by Simpson the
day before, it is not expected to cause problems for Reagan.
It did cause problems for California officials, however, who said
the state's costs under the bill could run from the 'tens of
millions' into the 'hundreds of millions' of dollars.
'We would have preferred 100 percent reimbursement,' said
Karen Spencer, Gov. Deukmejian's Washington lobbyist.
If the bill gets out of the conference committee it will then go
to the House and Senate. On the House side, the bill, which in an
earlier form passed by only five votes, faces a Democrat-controlled
chamber very divided on the issue.
The party's presidential standard bearer, Walter Mondale, opposes
the bill. But his clout was questioned after he delivered a
punchless speech Thursday at a Hispanic dinner. One lobbyist called
it 'the worst speech I ever heard by a major candidate' before a
sympathetic crowd.
In the Senate, the bill faces the threat of a filibuster.
In recognition of the difficulties still remaining, Lungren said
that 'what we've got to do is a lot of missionary work' to bring
over the uncommitted in each house.
The immigration bill is designed to control the tide of illegal
immigration into this country by making it illegal for employers to
hire undocumented workers. To make that program more palatable for
Hispanics, the bill offers legal residency to millions of illegal
aliens who entered the United States before Jan. 1, 1981.
Since both chambers passed different versions of the bill, a
conference committee began work more than a week ago to draft a
compromise bill.
Work snagged this week on the Frank amendment, the guest-worker
issue, and the federal grant program for the states.
Farm lobbyists threatened this week to mount a strong effort to
defeat the bill after it became clear that a favorable labor program
in the House bill would not survive the conference.
'That (an effort to kill the bill) may well happen' said a lobbyist
at the meeting Friday. Monte Lake said flatly that the guest-worker
program approved by the conference Friday 'will not work.'
That program incorporates some of the features of the House bill
including expedited proceedures for an employer facing an emergency
situation - and places them under the Department of Labor's foreign
worker program.
Farmers are concerned that Labor's administration of the program
will be so rigid that crops will be rotting on the ground while the
government slowly reviews the emergency applications for workers.
Farmer suspicion of the Department of Labor goes beyond that
problem, however. Agriculture always has felt ill-treated by the
department, which farmers believed refused to understand their need
for non-American workers.
San Joaquin Valley farmers now rely on thousands of illegal
aliens to bring in their crops.
Another danger to the bill is that the compromise guest-worker
program approved by the conferees may have been 'outside the scope'
of the conference. Since the final plan was not a part of either
bill, and therefore not properly before the committee, it could be
ruled out of order later.
Simpson's offer of a $4 billion/four-year block grant program to
help the states cope with the costs of legalizing aliens was
rejected Thursday. But after the word 'block' was removed and the
program then became a simple grant plan, it passed the conference
committee easily Friday.
Although the change in language may have satisfied the
conference, state fiscal officers are not as happy with it. They
also are concerned that the grant program is not a part of the bill
itself, but will be part of the 'statement of managers.'
That means the grant will be subject to Congress granting an
appropriation each year.
The administration's own projected cost of the program has been
around $10 billion. But administration officials believe the cost of
legalization should be shared with the states. |