FIGHT WELFARE FINE, DEMOS ASKS DUKE
May 2, 1985
Section: MAIN NEWS
Page: A08
By Jeff Raimundo Bee Washington Bureau
--WASHINGTON - The full California Democratic
congressional delegation petitioned Gov. Deukmejian Wednesday to
fight a Reagan administration decision imposing a $35 million
penalty on the state for high error rates in its largest welfare
program. The state's representatives told Deukmejian the assessment
will come directly out of assistance payments to nearly 547,000
California households on Aid to Families with Dependent Children.
Karen Spencer, the state's chief Washington
lobbyist, said the governor has not yet decided whether to appeal
the decision.
Without criticizing Reagan directly, the Democrats contended
$69.2 million in penalties assessed on 21 states and Puerto Rico
bears little relation to the states' actual performance in
administering the AFDC program.
Last week, the federal government slapped the states with the
penalties for erroneously issuing nearly $1 billion in welfare
checks.
In 1979, states were ordered to reduce their error rates to 4
percent by 1983, improving the rate by one-third annually until they
reached that goal. States that exceeded their allowable error rate
for 1981 were told to refund the federal share of all overpayments
in excess of the amount allowed by the timetable unless they could
prove their mistakes resulted from extraordinary circumstances.
California Rep. Robert Matsui, D-Sacramento, who organized the
Democrats' petition, agreed that without question, states must
adhere to some form of quality control standards.
Yet to be effective, he wrote, such a system must be timely,
applied fairly and be cost effective. The government's current
system does not accomplish these goals, he said.
California is being penalized for errors in 1981 despite a
tremendous effort in administrative improvements that have cut the
overall mistake rate from 12.3 percent in 1973 to only 6.8 percent
in 1982, he said.
Furthermore, Matsui asserted, an unpublished draft report by the
department of Health and Human Services recognized that such factors
as population density, crime rates, size of the local population and
size of the welfare agencies' caseloads contribute significantly to
higher error rates.
The federal government ignored those factors in determining the
states' error liability, Matsui said.
Ironically, he said, California's 6 percent error rate was one of
the nation's lowest when the new system took effect. Consequently,
it was forced to move faster to reach a 4 percent level - a system
that resulted in some states with higher error rates receiving much
lower penalties.
Matsui has introduced legislation that would force the Department
of Health and Human Services to consider those factors in setting
penalties. |